The right choice?
Thursday's decision from the Supreme Court on ObamaCare got both sides of the political aisle talking - in some cases screaming - as was expected regardless of the outcome. Someone wasn't going to be happy. In this case, it's the conservatives and Tea Party folks who feel they came up on the short end of the stick.
Guess it depends on which side of center you lean toward as to whether or not Thursday was a day for celebration or disappointment.
Personally I've been disappointed with the whole thing. I think the proposed plan is too intrusive and the idea of the government being involved in the area of medical insurance seems a bit far reaching and certainly not in line with the notion of private sector, business support. It will put the government in direct competition with private insurance and when you're the agency charged with making policy, it certainly seems like an unfair advantage.
That said, this country undoubtedly needs a health care overhaul. Too many people slipping through the cracks. We need to focus on preventative care to try and stop some of the more financially problematic conditions that force folks to seek emergency care down the road.
What bothers me the most, however, is the lack of honesty in the process to begin with.
When President Obama originally talked about revamping health care, we were told one thing, and given another. We heard about open door policies and televised discussions for the purpose of transparency. The American people got none of it. Instead it was all done behind closed doors like it was some kind of dirty little secret.
What should have happened?
Well, experts in each field impacted by health care -- from insurance, to pharmaceuticals, to research companies, to doctors, nurses, surgeons, specialists, dentists, chiropractors, medical administrators, etc. -- should have been brought together in a bipartisan fashion and asked to work together and come up with a list of areas to be fixed within their own particular area of interest. Then, still working together, they should have been charged with coming up with acceptable and commonly beneficial solutions and programs to better offer affordable care to the American people.
But that didn't happen. It's kind of what we were promised, but the reality was the government stepped in, took over and told us what IT was going to do to make everything all right.
Well, the Supreme Court ruled and now the line is clearly drawn for the November General Election.
The President has vowed to implement the health care law over the next several years. Challenger Mitt Romney has vowed to repeal it and start from scratch if he is elected Obama's successor.
The decision about whether America wants the Affordable Care Act will essentially be left in the hands of the voters come November - just where it should have been in the first place.