[Spencer Daily Reporter nameplate] Overcast ~ 28°F  
High: 33°F ~ Low: 24°F
Friday, Dec. 19, 2014

'Green' park progressing

Tuesday, May 22, 2012

With the Spencer City Council awarding a paving contract to Godbersen-Smith Construction, of Ida Grove, plans to develop Spencer's Green Industrial Park edged one step closer to fruition.

Both Godbersen-Smith's bid of $416,520.40 and local contractor Vaughn DeLoss Construction's bid of $420,632.80 were under the city engineer's estimate of $459,039.

After verifying the bids and the need for the project, the council unanimously approved it.

Brian Schmidt, of Cruse, Kate and Nelson, clarified the pavement was part of the development agreement with Pioneer for the $5.5 million, 200,000-square-foot distribution facility in the park.

He also explained that Godbersen-Smith has done work for the city before and is a subcontractor under DeLoss Construction for the $251,709 sewer and water extension project preceding the paving project. The resolution approving that contract was tabled until a special meeting at 5:15 p.m. on May 29 because needed documents had not yet been signed.

A 1 p.m. groundbreaking ceremony is scheduled at the site off of East Eighth Street in Spencer.

In other business:

* The council approved a budget amendment to cover the costs of the housing initiative and lights for monuments on Grand Avenue.

* The council approved a correction to the professional services agreement for the Little Sioux River and trail project with Kruse, Cate and Nelson in the amount of $65,000.

* Mayor Reynold Peterson announced openings on the Spencer Municipal Golf Course Board, Historical Preservation Commission, Plumbing Board of Examiners, Renaissance Initiative Committee, Utility Board and Zoning Board of Adjustment. Interested individuals are encouraged to contact Peterson by phone or letter of interest by June 10.

* The council went into closed session to discuss strategy in imminent litigation when open discussion may prejudice the city.

* The Spencer Committee of the Whole discussed pre-employment and random drug and alcohol testing for city employees and approved the topic for future council action.

* The committee of the whole discussed an estimated $30,000 sanitary sewer extension for one home on 18th Avenue West. The next step is to approve Kruse, Cate and Nelson as consultants for the project at an upcoming council meeting.


Comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, please Login or Create an account first, and then you will be able to flag a comment as objectionable. Please also note that those who post comments on spencerdailyreporter.com may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.

The City council is going to spend 30K so one person can have sewer? If the home owner wants to be connected to city sewer then he should pay for it. He knew there wasn't city sewer when he started building his house. Also he owns the entire side of the street where the proposed extension will take place. Not like the money spent is going to help anybody else. The other side is owned by the Cotton's...that land will never sell so won't benefit anybody in the future.

-- Posted by Chris-1 on Tue, May 22, 2012, at 7:14 AM

Chris-1...I agree. If I am correct in the location, the house next to it has a septic system. Why would the city spend $30,000.00 to connect one house? On the other hand, this is within the city limits. It would be fair to split the cost.

-- Posted by my2cents2 on Tue, May 22, 2012, at 9:11 AM

If the extension did benefit several people I'd understand and support it but not one person. I have a rental property near downtown that has a well for a water supply. I looked into connecting the line to the city and found the line to be a block away. I was told by the city my only option is to get an easment and pay to have the water bought 200 feet and through my neighbors yard requiring an easment. Better believe I'll be suing if this passes. I would have been estatic if the city offered to split it.

-- Posted by Chris-1 on Wed, May 23, 2012, at 7:36 AM


Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration. If you already have an account on this site, enter your username and password below. Otherwise, click here to register.

Username:

Password:  (Forgot your password?)

Your comments:
Please be respectful of others and try to stay on topic.