Spencer, Iowa · Wednesday, March 17, 2010
[Spencer Daily Reporter nameplate] Overcast ~ 36°F  
Print Email link Respond to editor Read comments (13) Share link

Castillo-Alvarez conviction overturned

Wednesday, September 2, 2009
(Photo)
(File Photo)

The Iowa Court of Appeals has overturned the conviction of Juan Humberto Castillo-Alvarez, the former Estherville restaurant owner and citizen of Mexico who faced charges related to the abduction and murder of Gregory Sky Erickson in June 1997.

Castillo-Alvarez fled to Mexico as co-conspirators were questioned and his restaurant was being searched for evidence 12 years ago. Court filings from the Clay County Attorney's Office led to Castillo-Alvarez's apprehension in Mexico and paved the way for his extradition back to Iowa.

Those same filings started the clock on the defendant's right to a speedy trial and Castillo-Alvarez did not waive his right to respond to charges within 90 days.

"We will ask the Supreme Court to review the split decision by a panel of the Iowa Court of Appeals," Spokesman Bob Brammer said, in a statement from the Iowa Attorney General's Office. "Meanwhile, Mr. Castillo will remain in custody pending the outcome of our request that the Supreme Court review the matter."

In reflecting the majority view of the Iowa Court of Appeals panel, Chief Judge Rosemary Shaw Sackett said prosecutors knew Castillo-Alvarez was in Mexico and to arrest him they needed to deal with Mexican authorities. Wednesday's ruling suggests prosecutors should have taken the potential delay into account before filing charges and, in their view, violating the defendant's right to a speedy trial.

"The county attorney was well aware that defendant was a citizen of Mexico and that he was located there," Sackett wrote. "The fact defendant went to Mexico in 1997 does not shed light on why there was delay" between the time trial information was filed in 2004 and the time he was arrested in October of 2005.

Brammer said the Mexican government issued an arrest warrant for Castillo-Alvarez before the state filed trial information or criminal charges.

"Formal extradition proceedings commenced immediately following the defendant's arrest in Mexico 13 months later," Brammer said. "United States authorities maintained regular contacts with Mexican authorities during that period but had no jurisdiction to do more to ensure prompt location of the defendant and execution of the outstanding arrest warrant. In short, we argued that the delay was attributable to Mr. Castillo."

Castillo-Alvarez's attorney, Patrick Parry, of Sioux City, told the Associated Press he was pleased with the ruling.

"I think they rendered a decision that is consistent with the law and the facts and they didn't get caught up in the fact that it was a notorious case and that it was a child that was killed," he said.

Greg Erickson, Sky Erickson's father, credited Parry for making some good points at the appeal hearing and said he wasn't surprised by the ruling. He said he hopes the Iowa Attorney General's Office can "find a way to turn it around again," and get the conviction restored with a ruling from the Iowa Supreme Court.

"I'm disappointed, obviously," he said. "The guy is guilty as sin."

District Court Judge Don Courtney agreed with prosecutors, who found Castillo-Alvarez responsible for the delay. Courtney then found Castillo-Alvarez guilty of second-degree murder, second-degree kidnapping and conspiracy to commit a forcible felony Jan. 25, 2008, at the Palo Alto County Courthouse in Emmetsburg. The guilty verdict came after a Clay County bench trial spanned parts of three days in September 2007.

"When we seek further review, it is discretionary on the part of the court," Brammer said. The Iowa Supreme Court could choose not to hear the case, could hear the case and uphold the Iowa Court of Appeals ruling or it could restore District Court Judge Courtney's conviction.

If the conviction is restored, Castillo-Alvarez will continue to serve Courtney's sentence of 50 years in prison on the second-degree murder charge. Courtney allowed him to serve the sentence for murder, the possible 25-year sentence for kidnapping and the 10-year sentence for conspiracy at the same time. The Algona judge had the option to make Castillo-Alvarez complete time on the murder charge before starting the clock on his kidnapping and conspiracy charges.

Castillo-Alvarez was to serve at least 35 years of the sentence. He would have been 73 years old before parole would have been considered.

Joni Ketter, Sky Erickson's mother, said she was shocked to learn the appeals court decision Wednesday.

"The emotions I'm feeling right now are pretty much indescribable," she said. "To reward this guy for skipping this country -- to avoid capture and prosecution -- I think is a real miscarriage of justice.

Nine others from Estherville were convicted for roles in Erickson's disappearance from a Spencer residence and murder in an abandoned farmhouse in Jackson County, Minn. Castillo-Alvarez was the last of 10 people convicted in the June 1997 scheme to end 15-year-old Erickson's life.

"When he (Castillo-Alvarez) was found guilty, I thought 'OK, we're finally done.' The other defendants had all appealed, but none of them went anywhere," Ketter said.

Evidence suggests Castillo-Alvarez used his brother's identity to stay in the country and operate his Mexican restaurant in Estherville. It was also a front for a drug ring . Weapons were hidden above the ceiling tiles. Drugs were stashed in a broken cooler and handed out in food carryout bags under his direction.

The gang members were unhappy with Erickson about a debt he owed Castillo-Alvarez and his enforcers. Erickson lost about $1,400 in money and marijuana after officers stopped a suspicious vehicle parked near a car wash in Milford on Dec. 29, 1996. Erickson began working with investigators as an informant following his arrest.

Two carloads of gang members caught up with Erickson on June 6, 1997. After beating him at a Spencer apartment, they pressured him into returning to Estherville, presumably to see "the man," referring to Castillo-Alvarez.

A jury trial was waived and prosecutors were able to convince Courtney that Castillo-Alvarez saw Erickson, or at least encouraged the violence, on the night of his murder. Erickson was beaten at Fort Defiance State Park near Estherville, then again at a remote location near Superior in Dickinson County.

From there, five gang members took Erickson to the abandoned farmhouse in Jackson County, Minn. One of Castillo-Alvarez's enforcers, Luis Lua, was convicted of first-degree murder for firing the fatal bullet.

Erickson's body was discovered on June 14, 1997. Castillo-Alvarez, who wasn't present at the farmhouse, fled the country as investigators began to piece together the gang's involvement in the murder.

Federal authorities believe Castillo-Alvarez was in Matamoros, Mexico, during his 10 years as a fugitive. A complicated extradition process came together in October of 2006, when Castillo-Alvarez was returned to Clay County after a court process in Texas. Mexican authorities wouldn't extradite one of its citizens on federal charges because the penalty contained the possibility of a death sentence or life in prison without parole. Castillo-Alvarez was returned to Clay County on state charges instead.

He received his sentence on April 25, 2008. He filed his appeal on May 15, 2008. The Iowa Court of Appeals heard the case in May 2009 as part of the 86th Annual Lawyer's Chautauqua in Okoboji.


Comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, please Login or Create an account first, and then you will be able to flag a comment as objectionable. Please also note that those who post comments on spencerdailyreporter.com may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.

shoot the bastar*! He took a young boys life--he needs to give his life also!

-- Posted by iowagirl on Wed, Sep 2, 2009, at 1:55 PM

If this were a drug case for which he was in prison he would be sitting there for life plus 60 months and that is without taking a life. Who gives a rats about speedy trial rights in this situation. Mr. Erickson had a right too! The right to live!

-- Posted by schwakl on Wed, Sep 2, 2009, at 2:51 PM

Two things, one...why should he have the rights of a US citizen when he was here illegally? Two, leave it to the local yokels to goof up the biggest arrest in Spencer history!

-- Posted by Molly Weasley on Wed, Sep 2, 2009, at 3:33 PM

I agree totally with Molly Weasley leave it to local yokels to goofing this up!!! He needs to be hung he killed a young man!! How would Castillo like not to see his children grow up like Sky's family has!!!

-- Posted by kldaly67 on Thu, Sep 3, 2009, at 8:32 AM

This same man chased my friend and I to her farm house with a friend of his, scared the snot out of us - I'll never forget that night.

What happened to the 85 years?? What happened to my friend Sky's life? I was a freshman in college when Sky was killed and I remember lots of us Estherville people hung out in the parking lot where Ace is now and him telling us what was going on & he thought he'd be safe. He was just a kid that got mixed up in the wrong crowd. :( All those people need to be in prison!

-- Posted by StevieJoy on Thu, Sep 3, 2009, at 10:54 AM

My thoughts and prayers to Greg, Grandma Hope and Grandpa Marv, and the rest of the family during this confusing time...

-- Posted by Zook on Thu, Sep 3, 2009, at 12:45 PM

There are too many people to count in this tragedy who are responsible or partially responsible for the death of Sky. I think the authorities should answer for allowing this child to be put in harm's way. He should have been protected!

-- Posted by latinasmom on Thu, Sep 3, 2009, at 1:27 PM

Once again illegal aliens get the breaks and we citizens get the shaft.

-- Posted by IALadyscout on Mon, Sep 7, 2009, at 9:32 AM

I am so happy he is finally coming out and to all those who wish the worst for this man may God bless you all..I know him cause he is my brother and he is inocent.

-- Posted by ecastillo79 on Fri, Sep 11, 2009, at 5:23 PM

If he was innocent why did he flee? His fingerprints are obviously all over this murder. He may not have been the one to pull the trigger but he might as well have been. If you tell someone to kill someone and they do it you're just as guilty as they are, and being ILLEGAL to begin with doesn't help anything either. He's just going to have to take punishment for his actions.

-- Posted by _Samantha_ on Fri, Sep 11, 2009, at 6:34 PM

HAHAHAHA...he's SSOOO NOT innocent.

That's all I really have to say, that and I agree with _Samantha_ !!

-- Posted by StevieJoy on Fri, Sep 11, 2009, at 8:39 PM

Speedy trial is not about if a person is guilty or not.

The only new issue here is that speedy trial rights were violated. Well, I didn't study law by any means, but I learned about the right to a speedy trial in Mrs. Alderman's High School Civics class many years ago. It's pretty straight forward. Did the prosecutors forget about that? Once again the authorities didn't do things correctly. Who files trial information, knowing the clock will start ticking when the person isn't even in custody? Who??? Maybe the same authorities that thought it would be a good idea to put a 15 year old boy in harm's way. An error was made by submitting trial information in 2004. Please note: suspect had already been in Mexico for years. They didn't submit trial info. and then he fled. It was not necessary to submit trial information in order to arrest or extradite him back to the U.S. to stand trial. So the mistake was made because there was no reason to submit the information that then started the clock. We do not decide who gets rights and who does not get rights. I can't believe that there are people who feel that if you are not "American" you don't have rights. Why would that make a difference? These rights are for ALL who find themselves in the justice system. Making an exception based on nationality is wrong. Coming up with every last ditch reason why this man doesn't deserve his right such as his nationality or his crime IS violating his right and acknowledging Speedy trial was violated. It's not good enough. It's just a lot easier to put the blame on the criminal than admitting there was a grave mistake made by the "good guys", once again. . .Deciding that everyone in the United States being charged with a crime has the right to a speedy trial except Juan Humberto Castillo-Alvarez is ridiculous. Many people feel the disappointment and grief over this, but there are consequences to violating rights.

-- Posted by latinasmom on Fri, Sep 11, 2009, at 10:48 PM

I strongly agree with latinasmom....I know that some might be thinking he is guilty but he is not and this is why God is being his judge now...I rest my case on this matter. I am sorry i have to be the one on my brother in laws side and not agree with all the others...

-- Posted by ecastillo79 on Sun, Sep 13, 2009, at 8:48 PM


Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration. If you already have an account on this site, enter your username and password below. Otherwise, click here to register.

Username:

Password:  (Forgot your password?)

Your comments:
Please be respectful of others and try to stay on topic.