Spencer, Iowa · Thursday, March 18, 2010
[Spencer Daily Reporter nameplate] Fair ~ 55°F  
Print Email link Respond to editor Read comments (4) Share link

East Milwaukee gets to stretch

Wednesday, March 11, 2009
(Photo)

New industrial park planned

The city of Spencer is seeing the first drops of a $789 billion economic stimulus bill signed by President Barack Obama in February.

The money was funneled through the Iowa Department of Transportation, to Spencer on Tuesday. The city will receive $422,500 for an extension of East Milwaukee Street through a Revitalize Iowa's Sound Economy (RISE) grant.

The money will assist in the construction of approximately 2,450 feet of new roadway from the east end of East Milwaukee Street east and north to future 17th Avenue East. The project will allow access to seven new lots totaling over 40 acres in Phase I of the Green Industrial Center.

"The first phase, roughly is a little more than $1.4 million so obviously this is a substantial part of bringing these costs down," said Spencer City Manager Bob Fagen.

Fagen was in Ames Tuesday morning to field any questions from the Department of Transportation Commission about the project. With Tuesday's approval, Fagen hopes to see work on the road completed in the upcoming construction season.

The city and Spencer Municipal Utilities purchased 200 acres of land between the east beltway and the city's wastewater treatment plant from the Green Family Trust in 2008. City leaders want to annex the land for an environmentally-friendly industrial park. The site would include rain gardens and a rural cross-section street with natural drainage rather than traditional curb and gutter.

In total Gov. Chet Culver announced approved projects totaling $30.9 million from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) for transit and transportation enhancement programs. Spencer was one of four communities to receive funding through the RISE program.

"During these tough economic times, we must do all we can to improve our economy and put Iowans back to work," Culver said, in a statement from the governor's office. "I am proud to announce that, with this action by the Transportation Commission, we are doing just that. Thanks to President Obama's recovery package, we now have millions of dollars to help improve our infrastructure. And as today's efforts show, we are not waiting to use these funds in order to help our communities and put Iowans back to work."

The DOT Commissioners also awarded $186,365 to the Dickinson County Conservation Board for the resurfacing and renovation of the original Spine Trail and Poyzer Trail.

Culver cited one estimate that a $100 million investment in transportation infrastructure construction supports and retains nearly 2,800 jobs.

The Commission also approved increased funding for Iowa's two statewide transit programs. About $10.7 million will go to assists public transit systems serving urban areas with populations between 50,000 and 200,000. A second earmark of $15.2 million provides funding for public transit systems serving less populated regions.

Department of Transportation commissioners also added $227.8 million to the highway section of the 2009-2013 Iowa Transportation Improvement Program as a result of the stimulus appropriation.

Story City, Dubuque and Iowa City joined Spencer in receiving RISE grants. Each of the applications focused on better access for industrial park expansions.


Comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, please Login or Create an account first, and then you will be able to flag a comment as objectionable. Please also note that those who post comments on spencerdailyreporter.com may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.

Pork. oink oink

-- Posted by helped_myself on Wed, Mar 11, 2009, at 1:38 PM

As I have been reading the headlines online for some time, I can see better places for that money to go! STUPID! Why not ask for help to keep a teacher in the classroom or to help a farmer stay afloat. Paving a few blocks of roadway when everybody is getting out of town to find a job is really "oink, oink" as another reader posted. This is not how we collaborate and participate in government and live an ethical life. When will we learn that just because we can GET IT we maybe should not take it! Weary of greed and poor citizenship!

-- Posted by emeyer5@cogeco.ca on Wed, Mar 11, 2009, at 2:28 PM

I'm grateful that Spencer received some of the stimulus money however it would have been nice to spend it on existing streets that are in dire need of repair. North Grand Avenue is a virtual minefield of potholes as are many other streets in town. Let's get our current infastructure in order before we go ahead and develop industrial parks in the city that we'll certainly have a difficult time filling up anyway.

-- Posted by Culture Warrior on Wed, Mar 11, 2009, at 4:41 PM

Unforunatly, when Iowa took the stimulus money, there were many strings attached. One of those strings is NEW construction and not repaving of old roads. Spencer could refuse this grant, , but then you will not have the potential for local people getting these construction jobs and money lost to the community. On a side note maybe the city/county/state should look at giving business corporate tax breaks and create jobs instead of bigger taxes and losing jobs to other states and or countries.

-- Posted by kastfamily on Fri, Mar 13, 2009, at 12:48 AM


Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration. If you already have an account on this site, enter your username and password below. Otherwise, click here to register.

Username:

Password:  (Forgot your password?)

Your comments:
Please be respectful of others and try to stay on topic.