Spencer, Iowa · Thursday, March 18, 2010
[Spencer Daily Reporter nameplate] Fair ~ 60°F  
Print Email link Respond to editor Read comments (7) Share link

Board makes final budget decision

Friday, February 27, 2009
With a few tears shed, a handful of harsh words exchanged and plenty of emotional public input offered, Spencer school board members voted to keep nine items above the cut line for 2009-10 Thursday night. At a cost of $348,176, these included an elementary classroom teacher, a vocational agriculture instructor and FFA sponsor position, the debate program, the mock trial and boys swimming programs, a high school social studies instructor, two middle school basketball coaches' salaries, a $103,593 package tied to full-time benefits for 15 teacher and library associates, and Activities Director Roger Johnson's position.

The board cut approximately $741,812, which covered items listed in 25 packages.

Two items dropped below the already tentatively-established reduction line were a combination math/alternative school instructor position held by Sarah Riedemann and a middle school music and elementary band teacher package taught by Denise Reit. Discussion to move a $103,593 package tied to full-time benefits for 15 teacher associates and library associates below the reduction line fell short of approval, with a 2-3 vote by the board.

Board president David Schlichtemeier initiated the 2009-10 budget-cutting discussion and public comment section of the meeting by stating, "We have a dilemma. We don't have enough money." He also noted how the community had spoken "loud and clear since Tuesday," and that it had been heard.

Teacher Larry Untiet, who spoke on behalf of activity and athletic sponsors in the district, was among the 10 people who advocated for keeping Johnson's position a "stand-alone position." Deeming the district's activities director the "activity engine at Spencer High School," Untiet also noted how more activities are offered at SHS than other schools its size, and that the district had attempted to combine his position with another twice before and it had not worked.

"And, it will not work now," Untiet said.

Throughout the public's comments, Johnson was referred to as "an advocate and an ambassador for Spencer activities," a "perfect fit" for the community, a "problem solver," an "encourager," and "a quality individual" whose efforts often go unnoticed by members of the general public.

In all, 28 individuals addressed the board Thursday night. The last to issue comments was a foreign exchange student from Japan who's only been in Spencer for the last two weeks. She advocated for music. SHS students Peter Buchan, Lindsey Kabrick, Victoria Foerster, Ethan Hartkemeyer and Emily Jones were among those to express their support for the district's music department staying intact.

It was noted that the district went to a six-day music rotation before Superintendent Greg Ebeling was hired five years ago, and that it hadn't been touched since.

Reit stood at the podium and identified herself as the "one moved below the line" with the reduction of the music instructor and elementary band package, which covers a half-time position to teach music as an exploratory class in the middle school and a half-time position of an elementary band instructor.

SHS band instructor Kurt Schwarck also advocated to keep the district's music department intact and asked the board to slow down.

"Because once it's gone, I don't know if it will ever come back," Schwarck warned.

Former board president Ross Brockshus related with board members, noting how hard their job at hand was.

"No decision you're going to make tonight is going to be good," he said, then encouraging everybody in the district to remain positive. Brockshus concluded his comments by telling board members that he would "respect" and "support" their decision, whatever it was.

Del Brockshus, his father, also addressed the board. The former Spencer school board member and 16-year Clay County Board of Supervisor told them something was amiss.

"A few years ago, the board of education saw fit to provide a platform for every special interest group in the district, and it was used to create controversy and division, but did little more than give those vocal few their moment of importance. Today, it seems we have a 'committee of education,' which you established, and you're being pushed and pulled by people who have an emotional agenda. I know this to be true by seeing the items you're considering being moved above or below the line depending on the emotional pressure you've received after each meeting."

"If you gut this administration," he continued, "you'll surely deserve the mediocre school system you'll receive, and the students will be the ultimate losers, and it will be a tragedy. You know, there were people who didn't like Jerry Roberts or Joe Graff or Glen Lohman. There are people who don't like Superintendent Ebeling, and there are people who won't like the next one either. But I'd like to believe that all have and are doing their job to the best of their ability. You may not like the individual -- that's your choice -- but I believe you should respect the position. And if I am to believe what I heard happened here the other day (Tuesday), then I am ashamed for those who participated and I'm embarrassed for this community."

Fellow Spencer business owner Dave Hultgren encouraged board members to keep the "big picture" in mind. As he advocated for Johnson's position, Hultgren told those in attendance if they didn't support the district's administration, they'd lose it.

As he then joked, "I'm a lot safer at SMU and increasing your electrical rates," Hultgren concluded his comments by stating, "I think you need to support your administration. And I will support your back."

Negotiations with certified and support staff were mentioned a handful of times by board members, the superintendent and community members alike. While board member Marti Bomgaars asked if holidays could be taken from the full-time teacher associates, she was informed that this would be a bargaining matter and that it could be placed on the negotiation table as a suggestion.

In follow-up comments made to the board, a part-time teacher associate in the district offered to take a cut in pay.

"I'd give it up for the kids," she told board members.

Judy McLaury, an Avera employee, told the board how all Avera employee wages and benefits were cut this week, and asked if something similar could be worked out within the district, possibly during negotiations.

"I understand that the teachers have a union, but I work for a large facility, too. This week their decision is to cut all of our wages by 4.75 percent and the CEO's 6 percent, along with decreasing some of our benefits. So, taking some of the benefits away, you're still going to have the same programs, everybody wins and you don't sit there and look at the person beside you and say, 'Is it going to be your job cut?' You don't have to decide that; everyone takes a cut."

The board accepted the packages as listed for reduction and directed Ebeling to proceed with reduction notices.

* In other action, the board unanimously approved the early retirement requests made by Sherry Clark, Patricia Quinn, Steve Steele, Molly Scott and Sheryl Patten, as well as early separation benefits for Kathy Elliott, if she chooses to leave the district's employ. The benefits approved total $121,466. Board member Barb Van Wyk noted her appreciation for the contributions each has made within the district.

"To say they'll be missed is a huge understatement," Van Wyk said.


Comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, please Login or Create an account first, and then you will be able to flag a comment as objectionable. Please also note that those who post comments on spencerdailyreporter.com may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.

I am very sad that the school board has chosen to eliminate a full time music teacher and a math/alternative school position. This will have a direct impact on all of the students that pass through the Spencer school system. The reduction in music now means that middle school students will no longer be required to take music and their only exposure to music after 6th grade will be if they choose to participate in band or choir.

I know that the town of Spencer always has been and always will be all about athletics. While I do appreciate athletics and have children that are interested in sports, I don't think that just having a strong athletic department will save our district. I think that there are other options that should have been considered and don't feel that the school board was given enough programs to consider for reduction. The board stated last night that they were looking for solutions. My suggestion is this: I would suggest that all assistant coaches be removed from the pay roll and keep one head coach for each sport at each grade level. This would cut thousands of dollars and would possibly help bring another program above the cut line. I strongly believe that there are many community members/parents that would step up and assist the head coaches in whatever way they can.

I hope the board is ready and willing to immediately work on ideas that will keep our district financially sound. I feel that there are things that could be done now to ensure this. Unfortunately, we will be back at the table looking at budget reductions again next year and every year thereafter until things stabliize. We need to be proactive and not reactive.

That being said, I do appreciate the school board's willingness to involve the community as this school system belongs to ALL of us and not just a select few.

-- Posted by SpencerAlumni on Fri, Feb 27, 2009, at 8:49 AM

Obviously this was a difficult decision and while I may or may not agree with what was done it is now done. However, this will not be the end of budget issues. I think that now it is time to address our city & state government officials with regard to education budgets. I firmly believe that if our city refused to give in to a handful of citizens and did what was best for the economy of our city the school district could thrive. I also believe that if our state money was better disbursed with education being a priority our school district could thrive. "Vision Iowa" goals should have been and should be education not new entertainment venues. The Big Picture goes farther than the city limits of Spencer, IA. Contact your representatives and become loud & vocal until they too make the right decisions for the goodwill of students.

-- Posted by Leah Cauthron on Fri, Feb 27, 2009, at 9:17 AM

Only in America would a school board save two "middle school basketball coaches" salaries instead of a music program. My gosh! Are kids of 12-14 NBA material already that they need coahes to be PAID???? And if the Spencer teams don't win, do you fire the coaches as in the professional leagues? If I may suggest, it seems that Iowa should look to a central funding model. All children deserve music, teachers and phys. ed classes, not just those in affluent districts (if such exist in Iowa). Sports belong in the extras where the phys ed. teacher coaches as an extra curricular freebie. FFA is also suspect as an expense on the budget.

-- Posted by emeyer5@cogeco.ca on Sat, Feb 28, 2009, at 4:28 AM

As a defender of athletics it should be noted that most assistant coaches don't make enough money to have much impact on the budget. Spencer's policy does not allow any non certified coaches assisting who have not had a background check. To get certified cost around a thousand dollars at ILCC and I believe takes six weeks.

-- Posted by Roberto on Sun, Mar 1, 2009, at 10:56 AM

The average assistanct coaches salary in Spencer is $4000. If you multiply this by the many assistant coaches that are involved in 7-12 athletics that adds up to a decent amount of money. In tough economic times like these it is something that should be considered for reduction and I do believe that this could have saved a teacher's position.

-- Posted by SpencerAlumni on Sun, Mar 1, 2009, at 1:01 PM

$4,000 is the exception not the rule. the two coaches saved each made $2,100. The two tennis coaches who fell below the line each made $1,500. That being said I will still give you that if you got rid of all assistant coaches that you could save a teachers job. Perhaps a solution that would make take athletics out of the picture and save a teaching job would be to charge each student $25.00 for each sport they compete in. This is legal in some states (I'm not sure about Iowa) and would save both coaching and teaching jobs. 90% of parents wouldn't bat an eye at $25.00 and the other 10% could get some sort of waiver as they do with the school lunches.

-- Posted by Roberto on Mon, Mar 2, 2009, at 6:14 AM

I think charging a small fee would be a great solution. I am not sure either if it is legal in Iowa.

-- Posted by SpencerAlumni on Mon, Mar 2, 2009, at 7:35 AM


Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration. If you already have an account on this site, enter your username and password below. Otherwise, click here to register.

Username:

Password:  (Forgot your password?)

Your comments:
Please be respectful of others and try to stay on topic.