![]() |
| (Photo by Russ Mitchell) Spencer School Board Secretary Sharon Slawson and board member Todd Korbitz prepare for a Saturday morning public hearing. The scoreboard was used to limit comments to a three-minute maximum. [Order this photo] |
Members of the Spencer School Board now have two hours of feedback to consider as they re-stack the priorities for another difficult round of budget cuts.
Spencer School District Superintendent Greg Ebeling said the district needs to reduce its budget by about $700,000 due, mostly, to continued enrollment declines. He and the Spencer School Board identified 34 areas for potential reduction in a list handed out to district patrons at a public hearing Saturday morning.
About 100 patrons, including students, parents and district employees attended the hearing. Meetings on Tuesday and Thursday night are expected to finalize the school board's decisions:
* A special 5 p.m. meeting tonight will give the board a chance to make adjustments to potential 2009-10 budget reduction packages.
* The board is scheduled to act on 2009-10 budget reductions at a 5:30 p.m. meeting Thursday.
Both meetings will be held in the board room at the central office.
The decisions could lead to eliminated positions in the classroom and reduced hours and benefits for aides who assist with the higher student-to-teacher ratios.
"When you have declining enrollment, it all doesn't come from one place," Ebeling said. "You can't equally trim in any one area."
Other reductions could end certain enrichment programs including middle school music, boys swimming, the local Future Farmers of America Chapter, debate and mock trial.
"Everybody is advocating for different things," Ebeling told the audience Saturday morning. "We saw a lot of passion around all of the extracurriculars. I'm very, very proud of the teachers who came and spoke that are advocating for teaching. That is a great thing because sometimes, the extracurriculars drown out the teaching -- and we are here to educate and for academics. I think that's why we're here ultimately while we also have co-curricular and curricular things that are important as well. It is first and foremost for us to get our kids prepared academically so they have options when they leave."
Patrons who wanted to address the school board signed up at the conference room entrance and were called to the podium on a first-come, first-serve basis. A scoreboard clock was set up to keep presentations within a three minute time limit.
Most speakers lobbied board members to spare a specific program or position. Those who offered alternative cuts typically focused on the administrative structure.
Science teacher David Munson said: "We need to ask ourselves, is it more important to do what's best for the students or to keep the administrators' workload low?"
Elli Wiemers, a math teacher at high school, told the board that staff members are called on to teach multiple skills, covering literacy, problem-solving, study skills, communication skills and 21st century skills including financial literacy and employability skills.
"Should you cut these teaching positions, all pieces of our jobs become more complicated," Wiemers said. "Class sizes bulge and the time available to plan instruction is decreased. At the high school, our ability to offer one-on-one time to students is already minimized due to an 8:15 a.m. start of the day. More students in each classroom further decreases the individual attention."
She added: "Before we cut teaching positions and positions and programs that touch our kids, perhaps we should first consider this: In this time of economic hardship, the district is no longer in a position to offer any more of an insurance package to the administrators than they offer to the teachers."
Not all administrators are receiving full family insurance coverage, Ebeling explained, during the question-and-answer portion of the hearing. The elementary principal doesn't receive full family coverage because his wife is also a teacher. The assistant superintendent is under a single-person policy.
Eighth-grade teacher Becky Koenig told the school board her place in the classroom is changing every day because of budget cuts.
"I just want the board to realize, every time you cut a teacher, or an aide you are affecting our front lines," she said. "When I have a problem in the classroom, I go to an aide before I go anywhere else. That's who is there. That is who our lifeline is. If we take those people away and take away their benefits, we're going to lose some quality aides and support for the teachers."
Spencer resident Judith Olson, a former Spencer School Board member, outlined the salary and benefits packages for five members of the administration. The employment packages for superintendent, assistant superintendent, high school principal, assistant high school principal and activities director add up to $616,563.
She called on the school board to eliminate two administrator packages -- an assistant principal/activities director position at $97,150 and removing the curriculum coordinator's pay from the assistant superintendent employment package for a savings of $25,070.
"As administrators, we'll take the arrows. If you want to blame me, that's fine. It's OK," Ebeling said. "Unfortunately, and I've said this before, because of our local economy and because of our state economy this group has to make some tough choices. The thing that is very tempting, in this time, is to say 'well, let's throw it on the backs of the taxpayers. Let's throw it on our local property tax and try to find more local property taxes' and make things happen. But with the loss of jobs in the community and people that we know are suffering because of unemployment and all of those things, nobody at this table has the passion to do that -- to say that we are going to increase tax rates so that we can cover this and make this go. I will not be recommending a tax increase -- it will be flat for property tax. I just think I have to do that."
The superintendent also said attrition was the primary factor in deciding which teaching positions made the list of proposed cuts.
"If you look at the positions above the cut line right now, those are positions that would have had to have been cut without cuts through retirement," he said. "The ones below the line are the ones that were cut though retirement."
Ebeling told the audience he was pleased with the participation at Saturday's public hearing.
"I think it does affect the decision-making process," he said. "I've seen, over the last several years, where we've had different rankings change after the public hearing. I do think it does make an impact and ultimately, in the end, it can influence what the board decides."
![[Spencer Daily Reporter nameplate]](http://www.spencerdailyreporter.com/images/nameplate.png)


To Mr. Ebeling and the members of the school board,
First of all, I'd just like to thank everyone for their service to the community. I certainly do not envy the tough decisions you are currently faced with. Also, thank you for giving the public the opportunity to voice its concerns during the hearing Saturday morning. While I was in attendance, I chose not to speak at that time as I felt somewhat uninformed on what had taken place during previous discussions on this matter. However, after taking into consideration the input of the members of the community during the meeting and reading some of the recent articles in the paper, I feel there are a few things that need to be said that I did not hear Saturday morning.
Unlike many of those that spoke during the hearing, I do not represent any particular program or any of the staff. I am merely a parent who is concerned about the quality of education my children will receive in the coming years and about the declining number of extra-curricular activities that may be available for them by the time they reach middle school and high school. It was mentioned by a couple of people that the long term solution to this problem lies within the community itself. It seems puzzling to me, then, that public input was not actively sought until only a few days before the final decisions are to be made. Spencer's greatest resource is the people that live here. Please don't sell us short and exclude us from the process. If notices informing parents of upcoming school related events, early dismissals, etc. can be sent home with the students, then notices requesting input from members of the community can certainly be sent home as well. Those of us that wish to help only can do so if we know that help is needed.
One thing that Mr. Ebeling briefly mentioned toward the end of the hearing was the possibility of raising property taxes to make up the deficit. He seemed dismissive of the idea saying he didn't want to place a burden on the local taxpayers. Perhaps this is something that should be looked into a bit further though. I certainly wouldn't mind paying an extra $100-$200 per year on my property taxes if it meant that the students would receive a better education and no one would have to lose his or her job or benefits. Our total income for our family of four was less than one-third of most of the administrator's salaries, but I think even we could come up with that amount. Maybe I'm incredibly na*ve, but I would suspect there are others in the community that feel the same. Maybe it could be put to a city-wide vote. Of course, it's probably too late for these suggestions to do any good this year, but please do keep them in mind if and when we have these discussions again next year.
As far as what can be done for the upcoming school year, I don't have any great suggestions. I dislike seeing any of the budget packages eliminated as I feel it erodes the confidence the community once had that its children could receive a top notch education. All of the budget packages on the list have merit. However, schools exist to serve the needs of its students, first and foremost. The people that have the most contact with and the most effect on the students are the teachers and their aides. They are the backbone of the school system. It doesn't matter how many games the football team wins, or how well the administrators do their jobs, or how well the buildings are maintained, without a strong teaching staff, the school fails, no matter how well the rest of the school employees in other departments perform. So it is imperative that teachers are given the resources necessary to do their jobs most effectively.
Several people spoke in defense of the extracurricular activities on the list. I won't reiterate what's already been said, but I would like to point out that colleges do look at the extracurricular activities a prospective student was involved in during his or her high school years when deciding whether or not to accept him or her. These activities can also lead to scholarships. If cuts need to be made in these areas, please try to do so without eliminating the program entirely. If my kids don't turn out to be athletic when they reach high school, I would like for them to still have the option of joining the debate team, mock trial team, or the school band. I fear that if cuts are made regularly over the next several years, there won't be much left to choose from in ten to twelve years.
Finally, I would like to point out one thing that caught my eye when I was looking over the consequences of reducing each package. In the section regarding reduced salary increases for the administration, it is stated "giving administrators low increases for multiple years will cause them to look for jobs in other districts." I'm not trying to pick on the administration, but couldn't the same statement apply to teachers and anyone else that works for the school? Everyone is being asked to sacrifice a little, either through elimination of benefits, increases in job duties, or just living under the specter of possibly having his or her job eliminated in the coming years. Couldn't that cause teachers to also seek other employment opportunities? And for that matter, couldn't the lack of opportunities for students lead some parents either to exercise their open enrollment option or relocate entirely? That certainly won't help the problem of declining enrollment, and we'll possibly have these budget troubles for years to come.
It doesn't have to be that bleak. Hopefully, if we do have this problem next year, we can be a little more proactive earlier in the school year, allowing more opportunities for solutions to present themselves. I know I'll certainly be paying closer attention in the future. I would just like to say you should be proud to represent a school that turns out students like those that spoke at the meeting. There are some very positive things in the Spencer school system. We just need to make sure they can continue in the future. Thank you for your time.
I just wanted to note that that public input was sought before that public forum on Saturday. The School district ran a number of ads in the paper and on the radio looking for members of the Budget Reduction Committee(BRIC).
They asked for a large group of district residents to rank the budget cut items. They used this to compare to the school board's and the administration's rankings. I know that there were about 40 people that were on the committee and I think that they may have had to look for people.
This process is long, grueling, and follows certain protocol. Unfortunately we can probably expect this issue to come up every year. Sadly, if you want to be involved next year you may have an opportunity.
I doubt that most people are able to check the paper every day. I know I try, but sometimes I'm not able to find the time. Nor do I listen to the radio often. My suggestion was to send home notices with the students that input is/was being sought. That way everyone knows what's going on. And from what I understand the BRIC's input was limited to merely prioritizing a small list of budget packages that was already chosen. In my opinion, that's not really giving anyone a chance to offer any real input. Instead of immediatley resorting to cutting budget packages, can't we, as a community, try to find some way to raise more money or look into ways to stop the declining enrollment? And yes, you're probably right. We'll probably be doing this again next year.
Priorities:
"A hundred years from now it will not matter what my bank account was, the sort of house I lived in, or the kind of car I drove, but the world may be different because I was important in the life of a child...."
Here is the problem with the Administrators' ranking, in comparison with the Community (BRIC) ranking:
If you save about 8 packages or around $400,000, 3 of the top ranking packages ranked by only the Administrators are administrative positions.
These 3 positions were ranked low by the community members' Budget Reduction Input Committee (BRIC):
* #25 (K-12 Literacy - Package J),
* #19 (Assistant Superintendent - Package I), and
* #17 (Assistant Principal/Activities Director - Package H).
I would like to give you a few facts in regard to the present fiscal year's Central Office and the High School administrators' salaries/benefit package:
*Superintendent's total salary/benefit package equals $165,949.56
*Assistant Superintendent's total salary/benefit package equals $121,453.50
*Senior High School Principal total salary/benefit package equals $127,453.50
*Assistant High School Principal total salary/benefit package equals $105,556.68
*Activities Director total salary/benefit package equals $96,149.40
I don't understand why Package I (Assistant Superintendent) was listed as a potential reduction for next year, when I read in the paper that Supt. Ebeling informed the board that the Assistant Superintendent is in the midst of a two- year signed contract, and if it were to approve reducing the curriculum director portion of her position next year, that would not be possible until the end of 2009-10. (This does not make sense to me).
In my opinion the two administrators' packages need to be eliminated:
Assistant Principal/Activities Director combination - $97,150 (Package H) and the Assistant Superintendent extra amount - $25,070 (package I). These two packages equal $122,220.
With $122,220, you could save the two transportation packages:
Package K - $27,299
Package L - $25,257
Total $52,556
The board would also be able to add back the High School Science Teacher and other programs that directly impact student learning. (I am not sure why we spent hundreds of thousands of dollars to build new high school science classrooms with quality science labs if we were planning to increase class size and to leave a brand new science classroom empty).
I don't think people really understand that we have many individuals in our community who are working hard at their jobs (sometimes 1, 2, or 3 jobs), or experiencing hardships by losing their jobs, and want the best education for their children. There is a difference between wants and needs in our homes and also in our school district. We must keep the positions that will give all of our children a quality education.
Which budget items will make a difference for our children and be reflected in any of these school mottos?
Learning Today....Leading Tomorrow
Learning to Live, Living to Learn
Preparing the Leaders of Tomorrow
Learning for Life
Yes, I hope that all of our school board members listened to the students, teachers, parents, and community members and make decisions based on what is best for our children.
Damon thanks for posting your letter - it's very well written and I think it hits on many topics that area parents are questioning and have concerns over. I also agree that the newspaper isn't the only way that the school board/administration needs to advertise upcoming events. I've gotten mounds of photocopied flyers in my son's backpack for upcoming events, basketball games, library days, tracking his reading at home.. so sending another flyer home letting parents know of the public forum would have been common sense. I know I recruited a couple of people who would not have otherwise known about the saturday forum and they are both parents of Spencer students.
Anyhow, I do hope the board takes the recommendations given to them by BRIC committee members and the general public and uses them in their decisions. If not I guess we as parents and taxpayers need to start fundraising and remember the decisions the board made this year - come the next school board elections.
I also want to say that we as parents and even students of spencer need to write our lawmakers to ask for funding for our schools and to make changes to the way taxpayer money is being used in our state. I believe Ebling and some board members may have some contact information for those lawmakers - otherwise I think you can find all that information online.
I was in attendance there and I spoke. What really bothers me about this article is that Russ Mitchell apparently must not care about the kids who spoke or what they had to say.. No names or quotes by any of the kids were mentioned in this article. Only those comments from adults. This is really a shot down at the youth who were brave enough and obviously upset enough to get up and talk. Its sad that kids are having to go and fight for the things they love about school and want in school. You can't even give them any of a recognition what-so-ever? Its not all about the adults. I know these cuts will effect adults, but the people it will effect the most is the students. They are the ones having to suffer from losing an education when their program they love is cut. This is why I firmly believe that the administrators need be the taking the first pay cuts. Sure you all do hard work, but do you really think its worth that much? Man I know many people the work way harder than the administration and make less money! Basically what it should boil down to is.. You think kids are already not liking school? Well most of those kids like only one or two subjects in school. If you cut those, then you just have another drop out. Do it for the kids and their education. If you really care that is.
As someone who spent the first ten years of my life in Spencer and who got his start in swimming taking lessons at the Y, it saddens me to think that boys swimming might be eliminated. Little did I know then that those humble beginnings would lead me to live the live I've had thus far - assistant coach at two Big Ten institutions, head coach now at a top-20 Division III program and owner of CollegeSwimming.com.
While small in scope, don't underestimate time impact of such programs such as boys' swimming. Spencer swimming helped give rise to an All-American breaststroker (Brille Bovee who, ironically enough, I tried to recruit but lost to Northwestern), its also provided life-changing experiences for dozens of other young men and women.