I have never met Warren Buffett, the Oracle of Omaha, whose net worth according to "Forbes Magazine" is 44 billion dollars. But I know a little about Buffett from a mutual friend who died in 2000 at the age of 96. The mutual friend was Joe Rosenfield, who was an incredibly wonderful human being and philanthropist.
Anyhow, this story (or comment) is about an article I read in the June 9th Sioux City Journal [http://siouxcityjournal.com/news/state-and-regional/nebraska/cost-to-lunch-with-warren-buffett-million/article_cdf91784-b24d-11e1-b4fe-0019bb2963f4.html], titled "Cost to lunch with Warren Buffett: $3.5 million". In the article, Josh Funk from the Associated Press wrote about an auction to benefit the Glide Foundation (which helps the homeless in San Francisco). An anonymous bidder purchased a private lunch with Warren Buffett for $3.46 million. According to the reporter, Buffett has been donating this "lunch with himself auction item" for 13 past auctions and has raised more than $11.5 million for the group.
I have heard and have read that Warren Buffett is a generous man and that he lives quite humbly---especially considering his $44 billion net worth. He has been in the news this past year offering to pay a higher percentage of his income tax and has said that it would be fair to tax the rich a higher percentage [http://siouxcityjournal.com/warren-buffett/image_213c5a06-dd5a-11e0-a9bd-001cc4c03286.html]. I am not finding fault with either Buffett or the outcome here---it is great to have three and a half mill donated to homeless people, wherever they may be. But I wonder what message this sends to a homeless person, who would be delighted to have $2.14 (the cost of two hamburgers from the dollar menu at a local franchise). What do people think about one millionaire/billionaire paying $3.5 million for a private lunch with another millionaire/billionaire?
Two things come to my mind: The French Revolution and the movie "Trading Places". I didn't pay that much attention in World History class, so I'll comment on the latter.
"Trading Places" involved a dollar bet between the wealthy Duke brothers (played by Ralph Bellamy and Don Ameche) about whether or not a beggar/con-man named Billy Ray Valentine (played by Eddie Murphy) could be successfully thrust into a career in a brokerage house--replacing a rising broker named Louis Winthorpe III (played by Dan Aykroyd). The other part of the bet was that the displaced broker would resort to crime when faced with his new-found poverty. Eventually, Valentine and Winthorpe learn of the bet and plot revenge against the Dukes. The Dukes end up broke and Valentine and Winthorpe end up being close friends and rich. (I told you it was a movie, right?)
What is happening to the so-called "middle class"? What is your reaction to the $3.5 million private lunch auction? Party on, Louis & Billy Ray!